By Dr T A Adegba

NEWSDAILYNIGERIA: Nigeria stands at the brink of a national reckoning. The country is not merely troubled; it is under siege. No region is spared, no community protected, no identity insulated. From Zamfara’s ravaged farmlands to Kaduna’s devastated towns, from the Middle Belt’s torched villages to Niger’s terrorized corridors, from the forests of Katsina to the highways of Kogi, attacks rage at a scale that reflects not mere criminality but full-blown asymmetric warfare.

Yet, amid this crisis, some voices persist in saying:

“He is not our own.”

This is not just a failure of imagination; it is a dangerous misreading of history and reality. Nigeria can no longer afford such luxuries. When a nation’s survival is at stake, the appointment of a defence leader cannot be dictated by tribe, religion, or sentiment. It must be dictated by competence, courage, and strategic clarity.

General Christopher Gwabin Musa (Rtd.) embodies these rare qualities. He is not an ornament of power but an instrument of national survival. As Nigerian military historian Alexander Madiebo observed:

“A nation’s security is never secured by sentiment; it is guaranteed by the rigor of leadership in the field.”

The appointment of General Musa is not merely timely. It is existential.

NIGERIA IS AT WAR — NOT IN A TRIBAL NEGOTIATION

For twenty years, Nigeria has avoided naming its enemies. Officials sanitize the crisis with terms like “banditry,” “farmer-herder clashes,” or “local disturbances,” ignoring the blood-soaked truth: the nation confronts a complex mosaic of insurgent forces:

Ideologically driven terrorists with international links

Armed bandit networks with economic motivations

Kidnapping cartels fuelled by ransom economies

Local collaborators embedded within communities

Political saboteurs exploiting instability

This is not a regional quarrel, a sectarian dispute, or a provincial skirmish. This is war.

War that is fluid, mobile, and ruthless. War that respects no geography, no religion, no community. War that resurfaces in new forms even after old cells are eliminated. War that requires military intellect, not ministerial ceremony.

Sun Tzu warned:

“The greatest enemy of a strategist is delusion.”

Nigeria has indulged in delusion for too long. Historian John Keegan once wrote:

“The battlefield does not lie; it speaks only the truth of competence, preparation, and leadership.”

The most persistent delusion is the belief that insecurity is a Northern problem, a Southern concern, a Muslim tragedy, or a Christian burden. Terror does not ask identity before it kills. To insist that the Minister of Defence must come from one group or another is to misunderstand the threat. Terrorism is no one’s “own.” It is the enemy of all.

See also  Decamping Perhaps In Search Of Nectar In The Politics Of Southern Kaduna

THE POISON OF IDENTITY POLITICS — A LUXURY NIGERIA CAN NO LONGER AFFORD

Identity politics thrives in peacetime; it destroys nations in wartime. It feeds on small thinking, narrow loyalties, and the illusion that shared tribal or religious identity guarantees protection.

It does not. And it is deadly.

A terrorist does not spare a victim because of shared language. A bandit does not release a hostage because of shared faith. A criminal gang does not check PVCs or tribal marks before pulling triggers.

To insist that leadership in a national security crisis must reflect “our own” is to embrace a death wish.

Retired General David Petraeus wrote:

“Counterinsurgency fails the moment politics outranks strategy.”

Nigeria has allowed politics to outrank strategy for too long thereby distributing security appointments as political favours, not survival instruments. General Musa’s appointment is a rupture with that failure which is a return to the ethos that the defence of the nation cannot be left to political arithmetic.

As Nigerian retired General T.Y. Danjuma observed:

“A soldier does not serve tribe; he serves the nation, and in service lies salvation.”

History confirms this. From the civil war of 1967–1970 to recurring cycles of communal violence, survival has required competence, not comfort. Leaders are selected for their ability to execute strategy, not to signal sentimental allegiance. Musa’s appointment rejects the corrosive politics of identity and affirms that the republic comes before tribe, and principle before patronage.

WHY A GENERAL — AND WHY MUSA?

Generals are more than military officers; they are repositories of doctrine, experience, and judgment under fire. They understand the moral architecture of command, the psychology of troops, and the dynamics of asymmetric conflict.

General Musa brings:

  1. Decades of Counterinsurgency Experience
    He has commanded units in Nigeria’s most difficult theatres. He understands the tempo of insurgent violence, the anatomy of terrorist networks, and the fragility of civilian trust. Military theorist John Boyd emphasized:

“Maneuver warfare succeeds not by brute force, but by the tempo of insight and adaptability.”

  1. Tactical and Moral Authority
    Soldiers obey leaders, not titles. Musa commands respect because he has led from the front, not from air-conditioned offices. Brigadier A.M. Abdullahi notes:

“The courage of the commander is the courage of the soldier.”

  1. Strategic Vision
    He recognizes that terrorists evolve. He adapts modern doctrine combining intelligence, mobility, communications, and civilian collaboration. Clausewitz wrote:

“No plan survives contact with the enemy, but doctrine survives to guide adjustment.”

  1. National — Not Sectional Loyalty
    His career speaks of loyalty to the republic, not to any region. Samuel Huntington warned:

“When civilian sentiment overrides military expertise, both the army and the state suffer.”

Musa restores expertise to the center.

See also  Now That The LG Are Free, By Tajudeen Tijjani

GENERAL MUSA’S APPROACH — DECISIVE AND PROFESSIONAL

A high-level overview of Musa’s doctrine:

1.Intelligence-Driven Strategy
Integration of DSS, police, military reconnaissance, satellite inputs, and community intelligence.
General James Mattis:

“Power comes not from firepower alone, but from the ability to understand the battlefield as a living organism.”

2.Joint Theatre Coordination
Unified command, shared information, and synchronized operations. Fragmentation is fatal.

3.Community Confidence Rebuilding
Villagers, local leaders, and displaced persons become partners, not collateral.
Sir Michael Howard:

“War is not waged merely against men; it is waged for the minds of men.”

4.Hardened Deterrence
Restoring the visible authority of the state; insurgents feel consequences.

5.Disrupting Financing and Logistics
Targeting supply chains, cash flows, and safe corridors of insurgent networks.

6.Regional Diplomacy and Border Control
Intelligence sharing, joint monitoring, and multilateral pressure on arms trafficking.

7.Morale, Training, and Professionalism
Well-trained, well-equipped, and respected soldiers fight differently.
This is the philosophy of a general, not a politician.

GENERAL MUSA’S RECORD — A HISTORY OF RESOLVE

Musa’s career is a narrative of results. He has led in Nigeria’s most complex operations, including the North-East insurgency and Operation Hadin Kai, restoring coordination, confidence, and intensity within the armed forces.

He embodies:

Terrain knowledge from presence, not briefings

Enemy understanding from direct engagement, not theory

Leadership by example, not orders alone

He confronts insurgent networks, criminal finance routes, and civilian exploitation with tactical ingenuity and moral courage. Marcus Aurelius wrote:

“A man’s worth is no greater than the worth of his ambitions.”

Musa’s ambitions have always been national, never provincial.

A Biblical Parallel:
Like Moses leading the Israelites from oppression, Musa guides a nation long oppressed by insurgency and mismanagement toward security and stability.

THE COLLAPSE OF THE “OUR OWN” ARGUMENT

Claims such as “Only someone from our region understands our pain” are false.

1.Identity Does Not Guarantee Empathy
History shows that ethnic proximity has often masked incompetence or corruption.

2.Identity Does Not Guarantee Competence
Leadership in security depends on skill, experience, and moral fibre — not birth or faith.

3.Insecurity is Not Sectional
Terrorists attack indiscriminately; a general must defend the nation, not a tribe.

See also  The Battle Of The Second Fiddles

Musa embodies universal loyalty, risking life for all civilians. The “our own” narrative plays into insurgents’ hands.
Colin Powell:

“Leadership is solving problems. The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them.”

THE GENERAL AS SYMBOL AND INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL RESOLVE

Musa’s appointment sends three signals:

1.To Terrorists: Impunity ends; the state is awake.

2.To Security Forces: Discipline is paired with direction, cowardice replaced by courage.

3.To Citizens: Confidence in government and military is restored; real fightback begins.

He is a modern Moses — a symbol of authority, competence, and moral legitimacy. Winston Churchill observed:

“Battles are won by resolve as much as by strategy.”

STATESMANSHIP, SURVIVAL, AND NATIONAL UNITY

Nations at existential risk choose leaders who can win. Churchill, Eisenhower, Mandela, Kagame were chosen for capacity, not popularity.

General Musa is a Nigerian general. That is all that matters when bullets fly.

The exigencies of war demand unity over division, clarity over calculation, courage over comfort. Musa embodies an ethos where professional competence supersedes parochialism, and moral courage is the currency of survival.

THE CRITIQUE OF FALSE NARRATIVES

Some claim foreign influence dictated Musa’s appointment. This is untrue, politically motivated, and dangerous.

Musa’s selection is domestic, professional, and historically grounded. Misinformation is the artillery of the weak; Musa’s record silences speculation. Robert Gates:

“You cannot lead if you are not trusted, and you cannot be trusted if your record is weak.”

CONCLUSION — NIGERIA MUST CHOOSE SURVIVAL OVER SENTIMENT

Politics cannot win this war. Identity cannot win this war. Appeasement cannot win this war.

Only a soldier can. Only General Musa.

Like Moses, Musa confronts insurgency, terrorism, and criminal networks with resolute authority. He is the deliverer of Nigeria’s hope, guiding the nation from the wilderness of insecurity toward a Promised Land of peace and stability.

As retired General T.Y. Danjuma affirmed:

“A soldier does not serve tribe; he serves the nation, and in service lies salvation.”

Nigeria now faces a singular truth: survival is national, and leadership must be professional, fearless, and singular in purpose.

Politics cannot win this war. Identity cannot win this war. Appeasement cannot win this war. Only a soldier — and only Musa can lead Nigeria through this dark hour to light devoid of political strings which is not a feasible reality under current pressure from the US.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here